June 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2022
Ex Ante Review in Realizing the Constitutionality of Law Regulations in Indonesia
1Muhammad Hafidz Habibie, 2Retno Saraswati
1,2Master of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i6-77

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:

This study aims to describe the model of constitutional review in France and the model of constitutional review (constitutional review) in Indonesia and to describe the prospect of implementing ex ante review in realizing the constitutionality of laws and regulations in Indonesia. The research method used in this research is normative juridical using secondary legal data. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the most influential comparison on the model of constitutional testing in Indonesia and France is in the position of the examiner's subject and the test object. The testing subject in Indonesia is carried out by the Constitutional Court, which is located as one of the judicial power institutions (judicial institutions), while the object of testing is in the form of laws that have been ratified and promulgated.

KEYWORDS:

ex ante review; constitutionality; Regulation

REFERENCES

Books
1) Atmadja I Dewa Gede dkk. 2015. Teori Konstitusi dan Konsep Negara Hukum. Malang: Setara Press.

2) Asshidiqie, Jimly. 2010. Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

3) Hamidi, Jazim dkk, 2012. Teori Hukum Tata Negara: A Turning Point of the State. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

4) Hardjono, 2009. Legitimasi Perubahan Konstitusi: kajian terhadap perubahan UUD 1945. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

5) Martitah, 2013. Mahkamah konstitusi: Dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature. Jakarta: Konstitusi press (Konpress).

6) -------------2015. Sistem Pengujian Konstitusional (Constitutional Review) di Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi press (Konpress)

7) Soejito, Irawan. 1988. Membuat Undang-Undang. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

8) Stone, Alec. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective.New York: Oxford University Press.

9) Syafaat, M. Ali dan Jimly Asshidiqie, 2006. Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Legislation
1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945

2) Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.

3) Undang-Undang No. 8 tahun 2011 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik IndonesiaJo. Undang-Undang No. 24 tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Journals/Papers
1) Arifah, Dista Amalia, ‘Indonesia’s Cybercrime Case’, Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 18.2 (2011), 185–95

2) Bell, John,French Constitutional Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford-New York, 1992.

3) Cappelleti, Mauro,The Judicial Process Comparative Prespective, Oxford, Clarencon Press, 1989.

4) Dessy Artina, ‘Keterwakilan Politik Perempuan Dalam Pemilu Legislatif Provinsi Riau Periode 2014-2019’, Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 23.1 (2016), 123–41

5) Gerhad van der Schyff, Judicial Review of Legislation, A Comparative Study of The United Kingdom, The Netherlands and South Africa, (London: Springer, 2010), p.135.
Website
1) Yaqin, Arif ainul, pengujian konstitusional (constitutional review) di Perancis, artikel hukum, dalam http://equityjusticia.blogspott.co.id/2015/02/normal-o-false-false-in-x-none-x.html. Diakses pada hari Kamis, tanggal 9 Februari 2017, pukul 11.54 WIB

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar